ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 Review
by Ian Cutress on December 3, 2012 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- AMD
- ASRock
- Trinity
- FM2
ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 In The Box
When competing at the lower end of the market, it can be hard to distinguish a motherboard with the extras in the box. The ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 currently e-tails at $100, meaning that if any significant additional inclusion was in the box, the ASRock board could be highly competitive in terms of bang-for-buck. Alas, no such luck:
Driver CD
Manuals
Rear IO Shield
Four SATA Cables, Locking
There is a small amount of differentiation – typically motherboards at this range have only two SATA cables, whereas we get four with the ASRock. Given the seven SATA ports on board, I would gladly take four rather than two.
ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 Overclocking
Methodology:
Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.
For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.
Automatic Overclock:
Using the X-Boost function at boot by pressing ‘X’, the system restarted and applied the top turbo clock of the processor for every level of load except idle. This meant the A10-5800K was adjusted to 4200 MHz under any load.
In the BIOS, we get the option for 4200 MHz to 4600 MHz in 100 MHz increments – each of these was tested:
At the 4200 MHz setting, the system applied 1.13875 volts on the CPU as well as a +0.060 volt offset. The NB was given a +0.120 volt offset, while the memory was set at DDR3-1333. This setting was stable in the OS.
At the 4300 MHz setting, the system applied the same settings as per the 4200 MHz situation but with a single increase in the CPU multiplier. This setting was also stable.
At the 4400 MHz setting, the system adjusted up the offset on the CPU to +0.120 volts while still keeping the fixed voltage selection the same as previous settings. This setting was stable in the OS.
At the 4500 MHz setting, the system upped the CPU voltage offset further to +0.180 volts. This was stable in the OS.
At the 4600 MHz setting, the system adjusted the CPU in terms of both fixed and offset values, placing 1.4000 volts on the CPU and a +0.200 volt offset. This setting failed stability during OCCT which produced an error on one of the CPU cores.
Manual Overclock:
For the first time in a long time, I am thoroughly stumped by manually overclocking a motherboard. Unlike the previous FM2 boards we have tested, the ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 failed to enjoy many manual settings above 4.3 GHz. When using the automatic settings above, everything was simple – but if I used the exact settings in a manual mode, the system would happily agree to boot at those speeds but fail to ramp up to full speed under load. This was a very confusing scenario, meaning that while I could boot at 4.8 GHz, and CPU-Z briefly acknowledging the speed, when I loaded up PovRay or OCCT, the system would reduce to idle speeds and never come back up to full speed. I thought that this was perhaps related to the AMD CPU Overdrive functionality in the AMD Control Center, but no combination of settings worked.
19 Comments
View All Comments
ivica - Monday, December 3, 2012 - link
is there for another reason. There are 3 options to set fast boot on ASrock motherboards, and fastest one disables "entering bios"... so, you can't access bios unless you clear CMOS or through that specific option in AXTU.DanNeely - Monday, December 3, 2012 - link
This seems like an odd feature for a midrange board as opposed to one targeted at the sub-ambient cooling crowd.That aside, I'm curious how it works. Does it just periodically spin the fans up long enough to cycle the air in the case; or is their a humidity sensor that detects when it needs to be cycled.
automaticgiant - Monday, December 3, 2012 - link
I looked at the Realtek website and the feature list for each chip but was unable to determine why one is better other than the power saving. It sounds like "The ASUS gives us another USB 3.0 controller, the ALC892 audio codec and the 8111F NIC - in turn, the ASRock board gives an ASMedia USB 3.0 controller, the better ALC898 audio codec but the 8111E NIC" is saying that the E is crap, but I might be reading into it too much.Merlyn2220 - Monday, December 3, 2012 - link
"Firstly, the amount of components on the top left of the motherboard is insane." This and the following statements are completely wrong. The extra components are likely tuned values of capacitors, resistors and ferrite beads intended to soften clock edges (reducing EMI) and improve high speed stability. As an engineer handling moderate-speed (sub-1GHz) clocks I can say with authority that these components are likely critical to the board's stability and performance. To say that having fewer components helps overclocking is pretty ignorant. /end rant.Rajinder Gill - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link
Most of those will be VRM related components. The amount of decoupling that needs to be used depends on the circuit. Generally, better VRM controllers and FETs need fewer output capacitors. The amount of surrounding circuitry for pulling legs of the buck controller down or up varies also - some buck controllers don't need a lot of external hardware to function.cosmotic - Monday, December 3, 2012 - link
In that last product shot, is that on glass or what?Wardrop - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link
No. It's the official ASRock product shot. You can tell it's two images layered one on top of the other. They've just added a very rough reflection and shadow effect in Photoshop.abianand - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link
What is AMD A10-4800K?- Power Consumption and Post Times page
cyrusfox - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link
Well it is obvious he meant the 5800k from the other pages but yes that is a typo in that table there.Garestle - Thursday, March 26, 2020 - link
Check this <a href="http://www.google.com/">google</a> and get everything you need.